Carbon dating nuclear
It might take a millisecond, or it might take a century. But if you have a large enough sample, a pattern begins to emerge.
It takes a certain amount of time for half the atoms in a sample to decay.
Would a carbon-14 analysis be of equal accuracy in this case?
Dating using measurements of the isotopic $^$C/$^$C ratio can be done even for quite recent dates, but the principle is different to the standard radiocarbon dating.
Plants absorb C-14 during photosynthesis, so C-14 is incorporated into the cellular structure of plants.
50,000 years into the past, but I'm interested in the other end of the time range: is there a point in time when younger (recent) specimens can no longer be dated with accepted accuracy?
I have read sources that place this limit anywhere between 50 and 500 years.
I have read that this difficulty in the young-sample range is due to the fact that not enough material has been depleted to calculate accurately.
With carbon-14 dating, what is the most recent date which can be accurately determined, and why?
Is there an accepted time range, within which, accurate results can be attained using carbon-14 dating?
Search for carbon dating nuclear:
This decay is an example of an exponential decay, shown in the figure below.